| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
161. Announcement:Dev Blog: Introducing Clone States & the Future of Acc... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Liang Nuren wrote: Malcanis wrote: No, they're what subscribers have always had. Regardless of the word "free" being used to describe what is factually an unlimited duration free trial, trial account restrictions don't make T2 ammo "pay to ...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.09.01 23:20:02
|
162. What would you do with an Alpha Clone account? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mephiztopheleze wrote: ...cloaky camping,... You might be slightly disappointed.
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.09.01 02:02:48
|
163. Announcement:Dev Blog: Introducing Clone States & the Future of Acc... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
EvilweaselSA wrote: so with the ability to get to 5m sp, skill injector prices are going to crash as people can create a farm of 100 skillgoop bastards for free then only subscribe them to train + extract once its profitable also, t1 productio...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.09.01 01:42:54
|
164. AFK: The State of Highsec Mining and the Effect of Upcoming Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Piugattuk wrote: Kei Nagasai wrote: The answer to the AFK mining "problem" is simple, why dont "muh code" chase after CCP to change the way mining works at a base level? So it requires more than just activating a strip miner? Oh wait, no, th...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.08.31 23:46:56
|
165. A crossroad of bad decisions (F2P) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ikshuki wrote: Piugattuk wrote: Just read about this, I think its pretty smart marketing, what this does in my eyes is keep players who have high skilled toons still subbed while bringing in fresh blood that doesn't need to pay to play but w...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.08.31 23:17:01
|
166. Now that we have F2P - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Syn Shi wrote: Xtreem wrote: the new accounts are very limited, I was more annoyed at skill injectors than this, by a good margin at that. an alpha can never catch up to my 13 years or play, an injector can, that grinds on me alot more tha...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.08.31 23:02:15
|
167. A crossroad of bad decisions (F2P) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ikshuki wrote: Andrea Cemenotar wrote: Ikshuki wrote: all one has to to do now to keep playing is to create 10 F2P accounts, get them in barges, according to the devblog alpha clones will not have access to mining barges oh trust me,...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.08.31 22:51:58
|
168. AFK: The State of Highsec Mining and the Effect of Upcoming Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mephiztopheleze wrote: It is 100% relevant when discussing the concept of 'consent' in the virtual world of New Eden./quote]So you admit you're doing exactly what I stated you were doing and trying to create a new definition of a word in the co...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.08.31 17:00:15
|
169. AFK: The State of Highsec Mining and the Effect of Upcoming Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mephiztopheleze wrote: This "conscious consent" you speak of had already been given: we were both undocked. That's all the consent I, or anyone else, needs to give. No, that's not how consent works. Consent is more akin to permission that poss...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.08.31 05:35:01
|
170. AFK: The State of Highsec Mining and the Effect of Upcoming Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mephiztopheleze wrote: Lawrence Lawton wrote: nobody should be immune from non-consensual PvP anywhere. There is no such thing as 'non-consensual PvP' in EVE. You explicitly agree to participate in PvP, in all its many, varied and obtu...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.08.31 04:30:32
|
171. AFK: The State of Highsec Mining and the Effect of Upcoming Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Solecist Project wrote: Teckos Pech wrote: Why isn't a transaction a type of interaction? The question is ill phrased. Interaction as a term means that two people do something with each other actively. There are no "types of interaction",...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.08.31 03:08:31
|
172. So we're Dev Hacking Skill Injectors into existence now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rain6637 wrote: They have an effect and that's why instead of Skill Injectors, we should receive Unallocated. Especially if a lot of players will use the item anyway like you suggest. Exactly how much of an impact dev hacked Skill Injectors wi...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.07.02 01:01:46
|
173. So we're Dev Hacking Skill Injectors into existence now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rain6637 wrote: Make your own market thread about the impact of SKill Injectors on market, don't hijack mine thanks I suppose I was confused by your earlier statement on the matter of economic effects in 2 posts at that point and the balance o...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.07.02 00:14:37
|
174. So we're Dev Hacking Skill Injectors into existence now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rain6637 wrote: Market discussion: Will giving a Skill Injector to each account #rek the Skill Injector market? Yes How much? A lot probably. /thread so now can we continue with this one That's a giant ball of assumptions about the number...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.07.01 23:33:19
|
175. So we're Dev Hacking Skill Injectors into existence now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A bit late for this reasoning isn't it? Freely created SP by CCP predates skill injectors. We've received a few unplanned downtime compensations over the years in SP form. Also, as someone who argued from that side when this came up these feel l...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.07.01 21:12:55
|
176. Daily Opportunities! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Doc Fury wrote: It seems CCP could not monetize this idea. Say bye-bye to your free 10K SP Not sure how that concept even works regardless of participation, but I'm sure their getting by just fine on subs, PLEX and extractors.
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.06.24 02:28:48
|
177. Dear CCP, consider changing daily reset to downtime instead after 22... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Moac Tor wrote: And it isn't you.. Take a moment to think. The reason CCP is implementing this feature is to encourage people to login. They know that the dailies for a large number of people have a psychological effect in which people feel co...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.05.27 02:12:11
|
178. Sticky:[Citadels] Changing NPC taxes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Tipa Riot wrote: Teckos Pech wrote: As for your smooth start I think that would be pointless. My understanding is that all the outposts in NS will eventually be converted over to citadels. There won't need to be an incentive as that will be...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.03.26 01:04:49
|
179. Allow triple character training on the same account - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Joe Risalo wrote: I really don't see the problem with this request.. I mean, you're paying for an account that has 3 character slots, yet you're locked out of functionality on two of them even though you can only use one at a time... You're pa...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.03.26 00:59:12
|
180. Let's talk about Loot Fairy - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why would you ignore the ship/rig costs? Seems a good portion of what you kill by your own description would have little to no cargo. Second, as I understand each item stack has a 50% chance to drop regardless of value, so no mechanism exists that...
- by Tyberius Franklin - at 2016.03.25 21:44:07
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |